

New to construction contract review? In-house teams at construction companies cut contract review time by up to 85% using LegalOn.
Every construction contract divides risk among the owner, contractor, designer, and others on the project. When that division is unclear, the cost shows up later in disputes.
The average U.S. construction dispute in 2025 was worth $56 million and took just over a year (12.2 months) to resolve, according to Arcadis's 16th Annual Construction Disputes Report. Many of them start with the contract itself. The report's two leading causes are parties who don't understand or comply with their contractual obligations, and errors or omissions in the contract documents.
Both problems can be caught before anyone signs. This guide covers what a construction contract is, what to include, which clauses carry the most risk, and how in-house counsel can review one before signing.
Flag risk in every construction contract before you sign. Book a demo →
A construction contract is a legally binding agreement that sets the scope, price, schedule, and risk allocation for a construction project. It defines what gets built, who builds it, when it is due, how much it costs, and how the parties handle changes and disagreements.
The parties may include:
A single project runs on several linked contracts. These can include a master construction contract between the owner and general contractor, construction subcontractor agreements further down the chain, and construction supply agreements for materials.
→ Related Article: AI Contract Review Software: Complete Buyer's Guide
The type of construction contract you choose primarily depends on who’ll absorb overruns if the project goes over budget.
In a lump-sum contract, the contractor agrees to complete a defined scope for a set price. This means the owner gets cost certainty and a clear number to budget against, but the contractor takes the risk of overruns. If materials or labor cost more than expected, the contractor absorbs the difference.
Because the price is fixed, clarifying the scope is essential. Fixed-price contracts tend to include detailed change-order and contingency provisions to handle what comes up.
Best for: projects with a well-defined, stable scope where the owner values budget certainty.
In a cost-plus contract, the owner reimburses the contractor for labor and materials, plus an agreed fee or percentage as profit. The cost risk sits with the owner. That suits projects where the scope can't be fixed in advance, such as complex renovations or early-stage work.
Most cost-plus contracts pair this structure with a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) and a precise definition of "allowable costs,” which prevents reimbursement disputes.
Best for: projects with evolving scope where the owner accepts more cost risk in exchange for flexibility.
In a time-and-materials contract, the owner pays for hours worked plus the cost of materials. The structure works for repairs or maintenance that start before the full scope is known.
Best for: smaller or open-ended jobs where the exact scope is hard to define.
In a unit-price contract, payment is tied to the quantity of work completed, at a set price per unit (for example, per cubic yard, per linear foot, or per item). This is ideal for repeatable, scalable work such as utility and infrastructure projects.
Best for: projects with measurable outcomes but uncertain total quantities.
In a design-build contract, a single entity takes responsibility for both design and construction. The owner doesn't contract separately with a designer and a builder. This creates a single point of accountability and often compresses the schedule.
The trade-off is that the owner has less direct control over design. For a design-build contract to work well, it needs to spell out design standards in detail.
Best for: owners who want single-point accountability and a faster schedule.
At a minimum, a complete construction agreement should set out:
This list stays consistent from project to project. What changes is how each term allocates risk, and that is where review time often goes.
→ Related Article: Contract Related Business Mistakes
The provisions in-house counsel should read closely before signing are as follows:
Reviewing these clauses against the same standard on every agreement keeps risk allocation intentional. LegalOn for construction includes attorney-built playbooks for construction agreements, subcontracts, and design-build contracts that apply your standard positions to these clauses automatically.
Before anyone drafts language, define the scope of what is being built and what the deliverables are, plus the pricing and payment structure. The more precise you are from the start, the less you leave open to interpretation.
Work from a reliable base rather than the counterparty's first draft. An industry standard form (such as AIA A201 or ConsensusDocs 200) or an attorney-built playbook gives you a known starting point with balanced terms. Whoever provides the paper sets the opening risk allocation.
Read the provisions that carry the most risk against a known standard:
A construction project runs on linked contracts. Confirm that the prime contract, subcontracts, and supply agreements allocate risk consistently, and that obligations flow down as intended.
Reviewing them together surfaces misalignment between what the owner requires and what reaches the subcontractors. Ideally, you’d store a single project's agreements in one repository, so the whole chain can be reviewed as a set.
A construction playbook records your standard positions and fallbacks on key clauses. Usually, owners, general contractors, and subcontractors need different positions on the same clause.
LegalOn includes attorney-built playbooks for construction agreements, subcontracts, and design-build contracts. Teams can add their own positions in plain English, and LegalOn applies them on every review. That keeps redlines consistent across a project's full contract chain.
Track every change from your standard position, and record the terms each party agreed to and why. If someone questions a concession months later, the redline history and the reasoning behind it become your record.
Before signing, confirm that the defined terms, dates, dollar figures, and cross-references line up across the document. This pass takes minutes and flags issues that are easier to fix before signature.
Done by hand, this process is thorough but slow. That is where an AI contract review tool like LegalOn helps, which automatically surfaces inconsistencies in construction contracts for your review.
→ Related Article: Best Automated Contract Review Software Tools
Retainage is a portion of each progress payment that the owner withholds until the project reaches a defined milestone, usually substantial or final completion. It is commonly 5% to 10%, and some states cap it by statute, particularly on public projects.
A GMP contract is a cost-plus contract with a ceiling. The contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fee, but costs above the guaranteed maximum are the contractor's responsibility unless an approved change order adjusts the price.
A flow-down clause makes a general contractor’s obligations to the owner binding on its subcontractors as well. This keeps each tier of the project accountable under the same terms.
A pay-when-paid clause controls when a subcontractor gets paid, usually after the general contractor receives payment from the owner. A pay-if-paid clause controls whether the subcontractor gets paid at all. If the owner never pays, the subcontractor doesn't either. Some states limit or prohibit pay-if-paid clauses.
LegalOn gives construction firms an attorney-grade first pass on construction agreements, subcontracts, and design-build contracts, so your in-house counsel can focus on negotiation instead of line-by-line review.
Engineering firm ECI cut its contract turnaround time in half with LegalOn, on agreements ranging from NDAs to EPC contracts over 200 pages.
Keep construction projects moving with LegalOn’s attorney-built contract review.. Book a demo →