In legal agreements, it's important to know how to handle disagreements. Forum selection clauses help with this by saying where legal issues will be resolved. Let's explore what these clauses are and how to use them effectively.
A forum selection clause (also called a “jurisdiction clause”) tells you which court will handle any legal disputes about your agreement. It helps prevent confusion by clearly stating where any court cases will happen.
The primary purpose of a forum selection clause is to provide clarity and certainty in the event of a legal dispute. It helps prevent potential conflicts and misunderstandings between parties by clearly defining where and under which legal system any litigation will take place.
A typical Jurisdiction clause might read:
Any suit, action, or proceeding arising out of, or in connection with, this Agreement and all contemplated transactions shall be submitted to the United States District Court for the [specific] District of [state] or, if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction, the court of the State of [state] sitting in [city/borough].
Forum selection clauses are commonly used in various types of legal agreements, particularly in situations where parties may be from different geographic locations or legal jurisdictions. Some key areas where forum selection clauses are especially important include:
When negotiating forum selection clauses, keep these points in mind:
Remember, where you choose to resolve disputes can really affect the outcome. It can change things like which laws apply, how much it costs, and how fair the process is.
Also, keep in mind that while these clauses are usually followed, there are exceptions. Courts might not enforce a clause if it's unfair or goes against important laws. Additionally, specific regulations in certain industries or jurisdictions may impact the enforceability of these clauses.
To give you a sense of the benefits of leveraging AI Contract Review Software trained by lawyers, we’ve selected some sample language our software presents to customers during a review of forum selection clauses in Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDAs). Keep in mind that these are static in this overview, but dynamic in our software - meaning our AI identifies the key issues and proactively surfaces alerts based on importance level and position and provides suggested revisions that mimic the style of the contract and align with party names and defined terms.
If you’d like to see more, we invite you to book a demo.
Any suit, action, or proceeding arising out of, or in connection with, this Agreement and all contemplated transactions shall be submitted to the United States District Court for the [●●] District of [●●] or, if such court does not have a subject matter jurisdiction, the court of the State of [●●] sitting in [city/borough], and each Party hereby waives any objection to the exercise of that jurisdiction. Each Party agrees that a final judgment in any such suit, action, or proceeding shall be enforced in other jurisdictions.
To ensure clarity and minimize potential conflicts in an NDA, it is recommended to include either a forum selection or an arbitration clause. A forum selection clause specifies the governing law and the courts with jurisdiction over disputes arising from the NDA, while an arbitration clause provides an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, such as arbitration.
This recommendation is particularly crucial in cross-border transactions, where parties may have differing preferences regarding the applicable law and dispute resolution forum. For example, a U.S. company entering into an NDA with a foreign company might prefer to resolve disputes under U.S. law and in U.S. courts. By incorporating a forum selection clause that outlines the governing law and courts, parties can avoid potential conflicts and streamline the dispute resolution process.
Relevant statutes or laws to consider include the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and the Uniform Arbitration Act (UAA), which govern the enforceability of arbitration agreements in the United States. Additionally, parties should consider state-specific laws, such as the California Arbitration Act (CAA) or the New York Arbitration Act (NYAA), which may contain provisions that differ from the FAA.
AI-powered tools like LegalOn can help legal teams:
The sample AI-powered insights we've shared demonstrate how LegalOn can enhance your contract review process, making it more efficient, thorough, and aligned with best practices.
To experience the power of AI in forum selection negotiations, we invite you to see it in action. Book a demo today to explore how our AI-powered contract review software can transform your approach to drafting and negotiating forum selection clauses.